Skip to content

For security teams

Investigate.
Don't triage spreadsheets.

Analysts should spend their time on judgement calls. Sentrasec does the deduplication, evidence-gathering and first-pass triage that normally eat the day before the real work starts.

The work that shouldn't be manual

Most triage time is not spent deciding. It is spent reconciling: matching one scanner's output against another's, working out whether two entries are the same issue, chasing down which service a finding belongs to and who owns it.

By the time an analyst has enough context to make a call, the call itself takes a minute. The hours went into assembling the context.

Sentrasec runs its own scans, imports the findings from the scanners you already have, and triages all of them with the evidence attached. The analyst starts at the decision.

Investigation workflow

From raw scan output to an evidenced decision and a remediation plan.

  1. Scan or import
  2. Deduplicate
  3. Triage
  4. Evidence
  5. Remediate or defer
  6. Remediation plan
  7. Jira / Linear
  8. Re-scan
Deduplication and triage happen before a person is involved. The analyst reviews the decision and its evidence, and the remediation plan travels with the ticket to the developer.

What analysts get

Triage decisions

Each finding is marked remediate or defer. Decisions are deterministic and keep the evidence they were made on.

Evidence

Every finding carries what supports it: the matched location, the rule, the scan that produced it, and the triage evidence.

Reachability

Whether the vulnerable endpoint is reachable, and whether attacker-controlled input actually gets to it.

Compensating controls

Whether an existing control already mitigates the issue, recorded against the finding rather than remembered by one analyst.

Runtime check

Whether the vulnerable code actually ships to runtime, or only lives in tests and tooling.

Imported findings

Findings from Snyk, Semgrep, SonarQube, Checkmarx, Veracode, Trivy, Qualys, Tenable, Prisma Cloud and GitHub code scanning, triaged the same way.

Plain explanations

A language model writes the explanation of each decision. It does not make the decision.

Developer handover

Findings that need action carry a remediation plan and test plan, so the engineer and their coding agent get the reasoning rather than a ticket number.

Decisions stay auditable

Every triage decision records what was decided, when, and on what evidence. When someone asks why a critical was deferred without a code change eight months ago, the answer is attached to the finding rather than reconstructed from memory and Slack history.

Records map to controls

Scans, triage decisions, remediation plans and re-scans are kept as records and mapped to SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR and DORA controls, instead of a screenshot folder assembled the week before an audit.

Vulnerability Triage for Security Teams · Sentrasec